Thursday, December 6, 2012

The Automated Document Factory (ADF) has transformed into an enterprise business tool

Print and mail tracking systems have certainly evolved over the years, but I am not convinced the perception of users and perspective users has evolved at the same rate.

I remember the early days of print & mail tracking systems (such as the LMO concept) where early adopters faced challenges of their vendors continually (and at the customer’s expense) developing interfaces and forever trying to integrate new processes and factory equipment into a rigid ADF architecture.  I am surprised at how many of today’s transactional, security, healthcare and financial document processors still tolerate this level of performance from their traditional vendors.
As mentioned in previous entries, I am not a fan of the term “automated document factory” because it does not embrace the value today’s technologies provide, nor does it focus on the core (information management) power of today’s solutions.  Perhaps, we (us vendors) have not done an appropriate job of educating our clients as to how they can improve their entire enterprise through use of an ADF. 

Current generation ADF technologies are no longer shop floor data collectors with proprietary systems, long installation times (laden with extensive professional services) and closed data structures.
The real value of today’s ADF is to make our customer’s business processes (and performance metrics) available to them at their fingertips while ensuring the accuracy and timely output of ALL processes.  We are in the business of providing easily accessible benchmarking and business performance information just as much as we are in the document integrity and compliance reporting business.   

The ADF is no longer restricted to print & mail operations, but now extends across all other production environments such as fulfillment, card processing, manual processing operations and shipping.   Current generation solutions, built on an open data concept, allow seamless integration of shop floor production management and integrity tracking with front office accounting, estimating and scheduling activities.
Open and scalable technologies, along with vendor agnostic architecture models, now allow the integration of these additional operations while making real-time data accessible for business owners when and where they need it.  Users should require full access to data, reporting and the ability to compare actual results with pre-production accounting, estimating and scheduling expectations. 

An effective ADF also eliminates overhead costs associated with process transitions, manual data entry and the reporting of SLA, productivity and job performance metrics.  Although eliminating risk (of late delivery fees and compliance penalties) continues to be the leading cause for investment in a tracking system, most installations can provide a very quick and hard ROI based on tangible process savings.
As I continue to see financial, healthcare, insurance and security print providers burdened with the limitations of yesterday’s ADF, it is obvious we must do a better job of showing our perspective clients how today’s ADF can improve their entire business.

By Pat Hoskins, pat.hoskins@ironsidestech.com, PH (585.953.3013)

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Return on Investment (ROI) Extends Beyond the Short Term

We are often required to ensure a return on investment over a given time period (often one year or less) for our clients.  Fiscally essential, this by itself can be short sighted.  When analyzing print & mail tracking or Automated Document Factory (ADF) integration, a long term strategy is equally essential.

What if my customer types, processes or equipment change? 
What is the cost of support over the life of the system?

How will developing technologies impact my business?
What future role will data analytics play in my customer relationships?

What is the cost to re-scale or modify my investment?
What is my vendor’s ability to provide service and support in seconds after an incident occurs?

These and many more questions should be examined and answered prior to investment. 
Good ideas should come from all sources.  Challenge your vendors to improve your long term business, not only short term results.

by Pat Hoskins, pat.hoskins@ironsidestech.com, PH (585) 953-3013

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Don’t call it an Automated Document Factory (ADF)

For the second time in the past week, I have been on calls with prospective clients who previously invested hundreds of thousands of dollars in an Automated Document Factory (ADF), only to use it as a glorified job management tool.  In these cases, the “big iron” suppliers seem to be taking advantage of the closed, proprietary nature of their “solution” to enhance their revenue stream, rather than enhancing their client’s business.  

Automation, by definition, is requiring no or little control.  There is nothing automated (or beneficial to the user) about requiring a check from a client every time they want to access their own data or closing off access to production metrics. 
I don’t like the term “Automated Document Factory” anyways because it does not address the two most important things an ADF is supposed to do:

1)      Ensure the integrity and privacy of printed information [compliance/privacy protection]

2)      Provide business owners with the useable information to better manage their business [workflow automation]
It is difficult for me to understand how document processing operations, so reliant on data to produce their jobs, would expect anything less than 100% real time access to their own production information from their vendor.  Any information management technology which is based on current technology should be capable of sharing information and communicating with other software packages without significant additional investment. 

In an era of increased competition for print & mail volume, print tracking, mail tracking & workflow automation software must be about helping our clients improve their business (on their terms). Whatever happened to the concept of making it easy for your customer to do business?
By Pat Hoskins, pat.hoskins@ironsidestech.com, PH (585) 953-3013

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Production Benchmarking- It’s About Improving Business Performance

Measurement of production performance such as delivery accuracy, asset utilization, waste, spoilage, operator efficiency, and productivity are, at the end of the day, just statistics.  The collection of this data becomes most valuable when it is easily accessible and used to improve business performance. 

Accessibility- Data must be available when and where the user needs it

·    Production metrics must be available based on real-time information so management can make decisions based on what is happening in their shop at any moment in time.  The objective is to prevent issues, not just correct them
·    Important data must be highly visible- Information must be presented in a logical format or reports which clearly explain desired metrics.  Consuming time to interpret data is defeating the intent of benchmarking
·    Information must be stored and shared based on industry standards to allow easy integration with other systems.  We all share our data with other departments, customers, vendors and business owners and should not be consuming overhead to facilitate this information transfer 
·    Effective benchmarking systems must protect the user’s original investment as their processes, equipment and jobs change.  These systems must be open and scalable to remain current and cost effective.

How should performance benchmarking improve business?  

The simple answer is that benchmarking should enable growth and reduce operating costs without adding overhead.  To the level these objectives can be achieved, of course, depends upon many factors unique to the user.  However, production benchmarking should provide one or more of the following:
·    Track equipment and operator utilization to optimize equipment loading, throughput and turnaround times
·    Track operator effectiveness to analyze where overhead can be optimized or reduced
·    Eliminate compliance penalties and late delivery fees
·    Provide open information reporting to enable users to verify and prove clients’ compliance and SLA requirements are met
·    Eliminate manual production tracking and data entry costs
·    Reduce spoilage & waste
·    Compare actual performance data with budgetary estimates to improve estimating accuracy
Pat Hoskins, Ironsides Technology, PH (585) 953-3013, pat.hoskins@ironsidestech.com

 

Monday, October 1, 2012

Great End Users…

What a great week - There is nothing like being on the shop floor, in the middle of production, watching operators work with your software to produce more efficiently and more effectively. Good operators want to create great work and welcome tools which help them to improve productivity and quality.  Their commitment makes a winning team and delivers client satisfaction. When your own product helps them do that, and you get to see it in action - it is a rewarding experience.
When a production expert, the operator, asks: “how can we use this do produce faster; and, why not do that differently” – and we listen – the end result inevitably is better software.
Too often we get caught up in the process of closing deals and managing business issues.  It always helps and refreshes to be brought back to why we do open software - so we can help with diverse production tracking and integrity challenges.  The business solution you offer is only as good as its’ usefulness.  Actually watching customer operators practice “usefulness” creates a real sense of purpose for our continuous systems development.  Comments and critiques from these hands-on end user experts are paramount in keeping us aware and ahead of the real world technology and “usefulness” curves. 
So – thank you to all of our great end users! Your pride, craftsmanship and drive to be better have motivated us to keep our software easy to use, responsive and leading edge– literally built on your tremendous feedback as users. We try to listen, and promise to work even harder to support you.
For another insightful comment on software in your print/mail operation, take a look at this recent post in Digital Nirvana by Nicole Schappert.
Thanks for reading, and please feel free to comment,
(508) 962-1649

p.s. COMMERCIAL: If you are curious about more Ironsides’ end user experiences, and if we can provide you with more information about our open systems and open data sharing, please just let us know.
Here is a quick 4 minute audio about Ironsides – it is a commercial! You’ve seen them before, and this one won’t kill you either…
Ironsides APT

Thursday, August 23, 2012

Data Security is a Print & Mail Issue with Benefits

The abundance of digital printing presses and the growth of 1:1 marketing have broadened information security risks far beyond their origins with transactional communications.  Multi-channel marketing strategies which blend direct mail, trans-promo and transactional communications have placed direct mail and commercial printing operations at similar risk.   

Beyond the tangible risks of compliance fines and SLA penalties, document processors face  the reality of losing customers and new business opportunities due to lack of controls.  Private data does not only consist of account numbers, financial and protected health information.  Simply, a breach is the improper use or disclosure of personal information. Exposing personal tendencies, transaction history information, email addresses and the like are enough to violate customer trust and in some cases incur penalties.
Providers of all marketing communications and mailings must follow procedures and incorporate baseline controls such as those outlined in ISO 27001/27002.  Proper care with data security and production should not only ensure data integrity.  Properly deployed, these controls should have a fundamental impact on business performance beyond the obvious transparency to data integrity.  By verifying and tracking the integrity of printed pieces, document processors in the direct mail and commercial printing sectors can fundamentally impact their business:

·         Eliminate late delivery penalties
·         Capture new customers which have higher integrity requirements
·         Reduce or eliminate manual processes for process handoff and production logging (logging of each production step, manual data entry, etc.). 
·         Improve equipment optimization and resource efficiency (i.e. reduce operating costs)
·         Defer capital expense on new equipment by adding intelligence to legacy equipment
·         Reduce waste and spoilage expenses
·         Connect islands of information (such as different departments) within an organization to allow business decisions to be based on tangible, real-time production data

Monday, August 13, 2012

Document Tracking & Productivity Solutions Should Adapt with Your Changing Business


The old days of piece, job and productivity tracking solutions consisted of closed technologies which prohibited users from accessing data and required extensive professional services for implementation or change.   Phrases such as “Automated Document Factory” and “File Based Processing” invoke thoughts of brand specific technologies which prohibited implementation across multiple types of equipment and limited users from accessing their own production data. 
The increasingly competitive document processing landscape requires us to use all resources at our disposal, regardless of equipment brands or process types.   Productivity improvement, integrity verification and delivery performance are not prejudice toward certain brands or types of devices.  Today’s equipment talks to us and we must take advantage of this data to run our business better.  As print and mail processors must adapt quickly to their customers’ changing requirements, “open”, ”scalable” and “flexible” are the pertinent terms  of today’s production environment.   

Thursday, August 2, 2012

Impact of Print & Mail Integrity Tracking

Print & Mail integrity verification should impact business performance.  Beyond the obvious impact of getting the correct documents out the door, data gathered during printing and mailing processes should be used to:
  • Track productivity by operator and by device to optimize production performance
  • Automate reconciliation and reprinting of defects
  • Eliminate manual signoff and logging between process transitions
  • Automated compliance reporting for healthcare and financial processes
  • Enable organizations to pursue and close new high integrity print/mail applications
  • Track job performance to reduce the risk of late delivery penalties
  • Automate workflow to improve throughput and reduce cost per piece
Integrity tracking has evolved from antiquated technologies such as file based inserting and file based integrity verification.  Today’s real-time technologies provide full access to reporting and data, eliminate the need for extensive implementation times and extensive professional services and allow integration on all print/mail devices, regardless of brands or models.

Although integrity verification and privacy protection may still be the risk based reasons for investment, integrity tracking clients should expect a tangible return on investment based on operational improvements and real-time access to collected information.

Monday, July 16, 2012

Document Accuracy Should Mirror Productivity Performance

When organizations use automated methods to track and verify the integrity of documents during production and finishing, the accuracy of these documents should be directly related to productivity performance.

Data collected to verify document accuracy and automate the reconciliation of integrity defects is the same data utilized for tracking the performance of jobs versus schedules and SLA’s.  This also the same data utilized for tracking the productivity of processes, equipment, operators and departments.  They are innately connected.

The challenge is that many document processors simply don’t have easy access to nor do they fully utilize this production data.  By accessing current information from their (local or remote) desktop, management can quickly understand where production performance stands versus schedules and customer commitments.  Load balancing, equipment allocation and operator decisions can be made to affect performance.  Printing and mailing organizations can then fundamentally ensure productivity and delivery performance with this same information they are collecting to ensure the accuracy of printed, personalized information.  The result should be improved delivery performance, reduced overhead costs and reduced risk of penalties.

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

The Value of Print/Mail ADF

If your business is reliant on the security and accuracy of printed information, do you ever consider:


  • What are your biggest risks associated with print and mail processes?
  • What are your biggest opportunities for new revenue?
  • What technology will measurably improve your business performance? 
The real value an Automated Document Factory vendor provides is making your capital optimally work for your business (not theirs). An ADF provider must understand your business, identify cost savings, operational efficiencies and the technologies which address these questions. Their business culture and technologies must provide measurable ROI which reduce your risk while improving business scope, productivity and profitability.

Today's ADF solution providers can not survive though use of yesterday's business tactics of hidden charges and closed (proprietary) solutions. The focus must be on impacting your business.